Offices across London & the South East:
The defendant was charged with producing a controlled drug of class B, contrary to section 4(2)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971.
The defendant was alleged to have produced £35,000 worth of 'skunk' cannabis in the house that he was arrested running away from, the Jury at Woolwich Crown Court returned a unanimous not guilty verdict on Hannah Talbot's client.
The barrister was Derek Barry.
The solicitor was Hannah Talbot. Read more >
Further to the service of a detailed skeleton argument by advocate ,Robert Rye, for an application to dismiss on a charge of robbery.
The Crown were forced to offer no evidence on the case and the… Read more >
David Lynn Prosser appeared at Bromley Magistrates Court on 30th June 2017 for a client accused of ‘Assault By Beating’. It was alleged that the client had punched his wife to the chest on two… Read more >
David Lynn Prosser appeared at Wimbledon Magistrates on the 27th June 2017 for a client accused of ‘Common Assault’.
It was alleged that the client had threatened his daughter with a knife during a drunken row.… Read more >
We are currently looking to recruit for positions based in Bromley and Old Street.
Please send your CV with a covering letter to Neil.Jackson@mk-law.co.uk Read more >
Client represented at Bexley Magistrates on 23rd June 2017 for ‘Possession of an Offensive Weapon’.
It was alleged that the client had in possession two bricks which he intended to use for violence or to put in… Read more >
Derek Barry represents client charged with section 20 Wounding with Intent at Croydon Crown Court on the 22nd June charged
After mitigation put forward by Mr. Derek Barry the client received a community order for eighteen months with a… Read more >
On the 3rd May 2017 Counsel appeared to represent a client before the Parole Board on the instructions of Jonathan Mellody, within this hearing full representations were put forward to try secure the release of… Read more >
The defendant appeared charged with a matter of ‘Disobeying any Lawful Order’ contrary to PR 51 (22) / YOI R 55 (25) in relation to diluting a sample for a random MDT and appeared for… Read more >
The defendant was charged with ‘Possession of a Firearm with Intent to Endanger Life’, contrary to section 16 of the Firearms Act 1968, ‘Possessing a Prohibited Firearm’, contrary to section 5(1)(ab) of the Firearms Act… Read more >