Alison Marks

Solicitor Advocate /

Alison Marks

Solicitor Advocate

Alison is a Solicitor Advocate with extensive experience in representing clients accused of serious and organised crime.

Alison Marks – biography

She appears regularly at both magistrates’ and Crown Courts. She is lauded for her wealth of experience in the preparation of complex defence cases. These include large-scale fraud, drug trafficking, confiscation, homicide, serious sexual offences, kidnap and robbery.

Alison has also developed expertise defending clients accused of causing non-accidental injury to babies (including baby shaking cases).

She’s a senior panel member of the Legal Aid Authority Peer Review Panel in the category of crime. Added to that she is also the secretary of the London Criminal Courts Association (LCCSA).

Alison Marks
Solicitor Advocate
Alison.Marks@mk-law.co.uk
Solicitor since: 2010

LinkedIn

Just some of Alison’s reviews

Alison Marks

Solicitor Advocate /
Military Law Specialist

Some of Alison’s notable cases

Alison successfully represented a vulnerable defendant facing a sexual assault allegation arising from an alleged incident during a late-night train journey. The case proceeded to two separate Crown Court trials, with both juries ultimately unable to reach a verdict, resulting in two hung juries.

Full case details can be found here

Represented a vulnerable client with a longstanding history of detention under the Mental Health Act who was arrested on an allegation of attempted murder of his father.

The client was interviewed in custody without a solicitor, despite his vulnerability, and made a number of admissions in the presence of an appropriate adult. Our investigations revealed serious failings by the appropriate adult, including the failure to secure legal representation. We traced the appropriate adult, obtained a statement, and ensured her attendance at court.

At a voir dire, we successfully argued that the interview was fundamentally unfair and should be excluded under section 78 PACE. The Judge accepted our submissions and ruled the entire interview inadmissible.

As a result, the prosecution reduced the charge to section 20, and we agreed a basis of plea of excessive self-defence, leading to a significantly reduced sentence and the client’s early release.

The prosecution offered no evidence at trial for offences of indecent images, purportedly found on our client’s phone. MKL commissioned a  digital forensic expert report that concluded that the material had been wrongly attributed to our client due to cross-contamination,  resulting in an acquittal for our client.

Instructed in a complex, multi-handed conspiracy to murder, firearms and drugs prosecution at the Central Criminal Court. The client was in custody and had been unrepresented until two weeks before trial, having dismissed previous solicitors and three sets of counsel. Legal aid was urgently transferred to MK Law shortly before trial.

Although the client dismissed trial counsel on the first day, he retained confidence in Alison and, acting on his own instructions, entered pleas to lesser offences of assisting an offender. He continued to instruct Alison for sentence and transferred two further matters to the firm.

The Judge has been highly complimentary of our careful handling of this challenging client, noting that it materially assisted the court in managing a difficult and sensitive case.

Defended the main defendant in Operation Spenser, a multi-agency prosecution of an extremely complex commercial-scale identity fraud spanning 20 years

Prosecuted by BIS for failure to notify as bankrupt the sum of over £1 million, following a fine imposed by FSA for an allegation of insider share dealing. Complex issues in the case involved the use offshore family trusts. Acquitted on main charges

Secured an acquittal for client charged with gang related murder, where the case hinged on facial analysis evidence and supporting cell site evidence

A multi-handed trial for conspiracy to supply class A drugs. Following representations and persistent requests for disclosure, the prosecution offered no evidence at trial against our client only